The Articles Of Freedom

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Challenge to FOX NEWS! Report on Facts NOT Emotions

Here is somethings that are not matching the issues.

Everyone on Fox is so strongly out to attack anyone who is seeking the birth certificate.
Labeling all of who are demanding for FACTs to be disclosed on Obama and his proof he is legally entited to hold the office of Commander In Cheif according to the US Constitution...
The Fox News is labeling anyone who has being such as a VERY SMall Group of Extremists.
It is carefully placing a mirror to anyone who holds these veiws as someone who is also a "Nut Case"
That We are not entitled to hold a true concern on what impacts the current paths of Obama has taken us down to socialisim.
Fox News is also going on with the statments that lable anyone who has these ideals and are claiming now that DHS Was right by their actions without a thorough investigation into the background of the indivudial who done the acts in the Holocaust Museum.

Fox News has also labeled anyone who opposes Obama and the issues related to thge constitutional facts he is not entitled to hold the position of President and Commander in Cheif as Hating Jews and Racists!!!

If Fox News wants to go into facts I challenge FACTS.
I challenge them to begin reporting on news that was given to thiem from a woman in Israel when a File Cabinet was sold to her by the US Consulate with records of US Tax Dollars being given to the Terrorist Group Fatah youth Group.
I also challenge them to be more concise and accurate in their actual reporting when it comes to reporting facts that I know I have personally sent to Hannity and Beck as well as Col Oliver North.
If they want to report facts? Then Do it!!!
Do not hide behind a shadow of fear.
When the "Pandemic" Was an issue I showed Fox News this was a Hoax.
From Doctors! even Dr Ron Paul!!! and yet it was not reported!!!

This is not fair reporting!
It also proves a very powerful statement.
There is no truth in the News and No News in the Truth!!
I am a bit skeptical on this act of violence. I will not say that it was Government intervention into stir up a panic. But I will not refuse this as being possible.
Was it something that was a lone man? or was it something that was spured on by any government agency. US Or otherwise.
Where did he get the Ammunition ?
Where did he get the weapon?
Yet more important who is this guy?
For one Fox News already reported that he was not just any World War II Veteran. He was the Commander of a PT Boat.
This means that he was an commissioned officer during WWII.
This also suggests that he has been involved in OSS which years later became the CIA.
He is been reported as having a criminal record of going into the Federal Reserve with a weapon back in the 1950;s This was during the same time frame as when Paul Volcker was part of the Federal Reserve (1953) in NY.
It is also important to look at not just the accused background it is important to look at all the details of this matter!
This is nothing more then a smoking gun into what the Federal Government wants to do if you disagree with actions they are taking and are not part of the two party system Maybe?
My heart and prayers go out to these whom where injured. Although I am not going to sit and state that this was not something that was a clandestine operation to escalate a more dubious action that the Federal Government wants to do to control the people. Even a tactic that would be argued to seize firearms.

Here is something to look at as well.
The Man that is accused attacked a Jewish Museum. This would resemble being a possible Pro Palestine movement. If you are not for the Jews you are against them. If you are a Christian. A truely bible knowledged Christian you know that Jews are the Children of God. and you also understand that the True Jewish Sect is not the enemy it is the Government which attempts to supress and create a clandestine Unrest among peoople that is the enemy.
When you listen to the News you here all the praise of Obama visiting the Concentration Camp.
What you haven't seen though was his actual interest in this issue!
By this I mean: He didn't take his Great Uncle on the trip. He didn't even provide him a means to go As I showed in the reported interview.

What you have seen is that this Administration has been condoning the acts of Iran being allowed to have Nuclear weapons. What you have seen is Hamas has been invited to talks and commended by this Administration
What you have seen is John Kerry and others Visit Syria an enemy of not only the US but Israeal
Actions speak louder then words people.
And the actions that I have witnessed is not matching up to the short visit to a concentration camp that Obama had made a mistaken identity of being liberated with Ostwitz which was actually liberated by the Russian Army. and only after he was exposed in yet another Lie.. YES I CALL IT LIKE IT IS!!! TAKE IT OR LEAVE ME I DO NOT CARE!!!. Obama only after he found out he was using his Uncle who he never spoke to about had to ask him about his time in the Army and liberating Ohrdruf, a sub-camp of the Buchenwald concentration camp in Germany.

If you disagree with me it is ok! But I know the facts! and the truth sets one free!
And all who understand what the Federal Government and NWO ajenda is they also know that we must act rationally in our dissent!
But only until the Government acts against the God Given Rights. And then we must.. I repeat. MUST Stand up for our Rights with deadly force if need be.

A quote from Major General Smedley Butler
There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights. - War is a Racket.
http://www.rationalrevolution.net/war/major_general_smedley_butler_usm.htm

The Obama PAYGO Farce...And Folks This Is A Farce If There Ever Was One.



Did you ever know anyone that would repeatedly go out to the bar, drink themselves unconscious, and then wake up the next morning and promise never to drink again? That is President Barack Obama when it comes to spending. This February, after signing the largest single-year increase in domestic federal spending since World War II, President Obama held a “fiscal responsibility” summit designed to “send a signal that we are serious” at putting the nation on sounder financial footing. The Washington Post’s Dana Milbank quipped at the time: “Holding a ‘fiscal responsibility summit’ at the White House in the middle of a government spending spree is a bit like having an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting at a frat house on homecoming weekend.”

Obama completed the exact same kabuki act yesterday, calling on Congress to pass “pay-as-you-go” legislation (PAYGO) the day after he promised faster deficit spending to stimulate the economy. Commenting on President Obama’s exemption for entitlement spending in his PAYGO legislation, Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget President Maya MacGuineas said: “This is like quitting drinking, but making an exception for beer and hard liquor.”

In theory, PAYGO sounds like common sense: Congress can only spend a dollar if it saves a dollar elsewhere. In reality, PAYGO is nothing more than a political gimmick that only enables higher spending and exploding deficits. Heritage fellow Brian Riedl explains:

1) PAYGO has never been enforced

* During the 1991-2002 round of statutory PAYGO, Congress and the President still added more than $700 billion to the budget deficit and simply cancelled every single sequestration that would have enforced PAYGO.
* Since the 2007 creation of the PAYGO rule, Congress has waived it numerous times in order to add $600 billion to the deficit. In fact, the entire “stimulus” bill violated PAYGO; Congress simply ignored the rule.

2) PAYGO’s design is flawed

* PAYGO exempts all discretionary spending, and would also allow all current entitlement programs like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid to continue growing on autopilot. It affects only new entitlements or tax cuts that may be created in the future.
* Even if PAYGO were fully enforced, entitlement spending would still grow 6 percent annually, and discretionary spending could grow without limit.

Already this year Obama expanded Medicaid liabilities by $200 billion over 10 years, and he is now pushing a public health insurance option that would cost $452 billion per year, or more than $6 trillion over a 10-year period. How does Obama plan to pay for all this new spending under his new PAYGO legislation? He doesn’t. The AP reports: “It would carve out about $2.5 trillion worth of exemptions for Obama’s priorities over the next decade. His health care reform plan also would get a green light to run big deficits in its early years.” So if President Obama does get his trillion dollar health care plan passed, you can count on another “fiscal responsibility summit” soon thereafter.

Quick Hits:

* In an unsigned opinion last night, the Supreme Court acquiesced to Obama administration claims that car companies are also financial institutions and refused to grant a stay to Chrysler’s Chapter 11 sale to Fiat.
* Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) defended his intervention on behalf of a General Motors center in his district, claiming his example will not lead other lawmakers to do the same thing.
* In the Washington Post, Brookings Institution senior fellow Michael O’Hanlon says the Obama administration’s defense budget is “insufficient to support the national security establishment over the next five years.”
* Senate Judiciary Committee chair Patrick Leahy (D-VT) unilaterally set Sonia Sotomayor’s Supreme Court confirmation hearing for July 13 yesterday.
* A new study shows that trains emit more greenhouse gas over their full life-cycle than airplanes do.

Video: Obama Stimulus Hope vs Job Loss Reality

Who Is Minding The Store